At the end of three decades of anti-growth anti-Western civilization critique, the act culminated in the 911 attack in 2001. The initial decades were supported through covert Soviet activities in Western Europe and the US, followed by the naive unaimed pro-immigration activism of the 90ties that did not even see an opportunity for the integration of Eastern Europe and Russia into the Western hemisphere. The effort was then for a short while dissolved into an anti-liberal George W Bush-bashing cult lasting additional 20 years, reorganization of resources, then the final metamorphosis into the present militaristic environmentalist LGBT+ movement.
A centerpiece of the western critique was the pro-immigration movement that spiraled into mainstream culture through bands like U2 and movie productions such as Wim Wenders trilogy on globalization. The movement and its participants most often used distortion to create innovations of progress: Creating abuse and causing increased immigration from non-Western societies through the redelegation of resources otherwise provided for the self-protective mechanisms and cultural institutions in receiving countries. In that context, in particular, we observe the sexualization of otherwise rational demographic political argumentation. Sex across social and geographic borders has always been a brute force for gaining a foothold at the expense of others and requires a very dynamic demographic to succeed in a geopolitical context, as seen during the era of the Napoleonic wars and postwar Europe. The ideologies underlining the redistribution of wealth have several psychological implications, and it is no coincidence changes of both damaging and constructive character are often based on sexual initialized relationships between romantic naive wealthy sympathizers and people driven by basic needs or owned by special interests. Pro-immigrant special interests most often transform very fast into clear nepotist goals of personal enrichment articulated through political or religious speech, which may be pure camouflage for deceitful intentions or contribute to shadow movements that often bind to the aesthetics in mainstream popular culture.
A clear example of a character of great aesthetic importance around 2000 is Solweig Dommartin the French actress and traveling partner of Wim Wenders, a movie maker and organizer of great importance to the portrait of the Eastern-Western axis of conflict across Europe. The Marilyn Monroe of the European feel-good movement and at the center of several intelligence affairs. She was also part of the pro-African pro-immigration movement, as was Ghislaine Maxwell and other powerful Jews, and a series of very young female politicians, among them several present leaders. Mette Frederiksen, the current prime minister of Denmark, became a member of ANC Youth as a child and advocated African pro-immigration through her sexual behavior which also involved veterans with attainable relations. Mette Frederiksen also exploited sources based on conservative historic innovations, from which she was then able to establish further progress including the progress through the attention of a very wealthy environmentalist with a foot in the anti-Western movement. The same scheme has been more publicly observed with respect to Ghislaine Maxwell and the European courts and veterans networks. In the process, we see a loss of paradise as the abuse becomes apparent. Injustice causes harm to innocent and constructive people with a great negative effect on a huge number of middle-class families. The affairs and algorithms of Maxwell, the royal Danish court, and the royal British court might even have been exploited to the unashamed advantage of Mette Fredriksen in the late zeroes and the early tenths, through common victims of abuse. This is not a strange phenomenon as the pro-immigrant movements attached to the environmentalist LBGT+ networks work on a relative scale dissolving ordinary concerns for both individuals and society. The hypocrisy is the camouflage of ethnic micro organization of Jewish and Muslim related social and economic violence with terrorism as most ultimate expression. Most often those value streams run in parallel to the native formal relations and veteran communication without receiving sufficient critique. I see the effort of Angela Merkel against the US-dominated security politics as a critique of the unprotected state from which millions of Europeans suffer, because of ineligible premises and constructs in direct conflict with the progress of societies and the general development of democracies.
The nihilistic interpretation belongs to the deceived that do not recognize the shift in technology, demographics, and culture. The correct conventional interpretation is thus only present at a distance in time and geography, and from that perspective, we see the Muslim, Jewish supported warfare on Europe as pure enrichment crime. The engagement in warfare in Iraq and Afghanistan can therefore also be seen as a way to buy time for industrious reconstruction, although exposure to the violent consequences of nepotist special interests is inevitable.
Comments